breakfast all day

Because pancakes for dinner makes everyone happy.

17 notes

slavin:


“To verify its suspicions, Google set up a sting operation. For the first time in its history, Google crafted one-time code that would allow it to manually rank a page for a certain term (code that will soon be removed, as described further below). It then created about 100 of what it calls “synthetic” searches, queries that few people, if anyone, would ever enter into Google.
These searches returned no matches on Google or Bing — or a tiny number of poor quality matches, in a few cases — before the experiment went live. With the code enabled, Google placed a honeypot page to show up at the top of each synthetic search.
The only reason these pages appeared on Google was because Google forced them to be there. There was nothing that made them naturally relevant for these searches. If they started to appeared at Bing after Google, that would mean that Bing took Google’s bait and copied its results.
This all happened in December. When the experiment was ready, about 20 Google engineers were told to run the test queries from laptops at home, using Internet Explorer, with Suggested Sites and the Bing Toolbar both enabled. They were also told to click on the top results. They started on December 17. By December 31, some of the results started appearing on Bing.”
(Google: Bing Is Cheating, Copying Our Search Results)

I can’t explain quite why these kinds of stories bring me such joy, except that they reveal mighty levers being used in ways you would never imagine, moving machinery you never knew existed. The pleasure has something to do with that.

slavin:

“To verify its suspicions, Google set up a sting operation. For the first time in its history, Google crafted one-time code that would allow it to manually rank a page for a certain term (code that will soon be removed, as described further below). It then created about 100 of what it calls “synthetic” searches, queries that few people, if anyone, would ever enter into Google.

These searches returned no matches on Google or Bing — or a tiny number of poor quality matches, in a few cases — before the experiment went live. With the code enabled, Google placed a honeypot page to show up at the top of each synthetic search.

The only reason these pages appeared on Google was because Google forced them to be there. There was nothing that made them naturally relevant for these searches. If they started to appeared at Bing after Google, that would mean that Bing took Google’s bait and copied its results.

This all happened in December. When the experiment was ready, about 20 Google engineers were told to run the test queries from laptops at home, using Internet Explorer, with Suggested Sites and the Bing Toolbar both enabled. They were also told to click on the top results. They started on December 17. By December 31, some of the results started appearing on Bing.”

(Google: Bing Is Cheating, Copying Our Search Results)

I can’t explain quite why these kinds of stories bring me such joy, except that they reveal mighty levers being used in ways you would never imagine, moving machinery you never knew existed. The pleasure has something to do with that.

(via rosiesiman)

  1. planconstructdo reblogged this from rosiesiman
  2. katiefitz reblogged this from rosiesiman
  3. andrewgraham reblogged this from rosiesiman
  4. rosiesiman reblogged this from slavin
  5. kthread reblogged this from slavin and added:
    And I find these fascinating because actually it’s still about people and curating and editing and manually looking for...
  6. ej32 reblogged this from slavin
  7. slavin posted this